Enterprises process large volumes of purchase orders, making it difficult to manually identify errors, unusual activity, or potential fraud. Legacy OCR systems can extract PO data but lack the intelligence to analyze patterns such as abnormal pricing, quantity deviations, or supplier anomalies. This forces procurement teams to rely on time-consuming manual checks, increasing operational costs and exposing organizations to financial and compliance risks.
AI-powered PO anomaly detection automates the identification of irregularities by comparing purchase orders against historical trends, contract terms, and market benchmarks. By proactively flagging unusual pricing, quantities, or supplier activity, organizations reduce procurement risk, prevent financial leakage, and accelerate approval cycles.
This total cost of ownership calculator helps you evaluate the true ROI of the category using modern AI powered alternatives over traditional OCR based solutions.
Key Use Cases:
PO Anomaly Detection
Detects anomalies in purchase orders such as abnormal pricing, unexpected suppliers, or large quantity deviations.
Price & Quantity Anomaly Check
Flags incorrect pricing or quantity trends by comparing against historical data, contracts, and standard rates.
Start by selecting a typical scenario or adjust the baseline details to reflect your exact needs. The calculator will update automatically.
Legacy OCR solutions achieve 80% accuracy and cannot analyze historical or contextual PO data. Procurement teams must manually review purchase orders for anomalies, significantly increasing cycle times, costs, and the likelihood of missed errors.
Modern AI with OCR, NLP, and anomaly detection models achieves 92% accuracy ±2%, enabling proactive detection of suspicious or non-compliant PO activity. While this reduces manual effort substantially, AI cannot always distinguish between true anomalies and acceptable business exceptions, requiring targeted verification before approvals.
Your AI investment isn’t delivering expected savings. This may indicate inefficiencies or incorrect assumptions in your current workflow.
Contact us to identify more optimization opportunities.
Contact Us